Annals of Anesthesiology and Critical Care

Published by: Kowsar

Hemodynamic Changes After Intubation of Endotracheal Tube, LMA Classic, and I-gel in Patients Candidates for Elective Eye Surgery

Reza Akhondzadeh 1 , * , Salman Vojdani 1 and Seyed Mehdi Aslani 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Article information
  • Annals of Anesthesiology and Critical Care: April 2018, 3 (1); e11701
  • Published Online: July 22, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: April 10, 2017
  • Revised: January 27, 2018
  • Accepted: April 10, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/aacc.11701

To Cite: Akhondzadeh R, Vojdani S, Aslani S M. Hemodynamic Changes After Intubation of Endotracheal Tube, LMA Classic, and I-gel in Patients Candidates for Elective Eye Surgery, Ann Anesth Crit Care . 2018 ; 3(1):e11701. doi: 10.5812/aacc.11701.

Copyright © 2018, Iranian Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Eydi M, Kolahdouzan K, Golzari SE. Effect of intravenous hydrocortisone on preventing postoperative sore throat followed by laryngeal mask airway use in patients undergoing urogenital surgeries. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2013;5(1):29-33. doi: 10.5681/jcvtr.2013.006. [PubMed: 24251006]. [PubMed Central: PMC3825377].
  • 2. Nesioonpour S, Mokmeli S, Vojdani S, Mohtadi A, Akhondzadeh R, Behaeen K, et al. The effect of low-level laser on postoperative pain after tibial fracture surgery: A single-blind controlled randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiol Pain Med. 2014;4(3). doi: 10.5812/aapm.17350.
  • 3. Hosseinzadeh H, Golzari SE, Torabi E, Dehdilani M. Hemodynamic changes following anesthesia induction and LMA insertion with propofol, etomidate, and propofol + etomidate. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2013;5(3):109-12. doi: 10.5681/jcvtr.2013.023. [PubMed: 24252986]. [PubMed Central: PMC3825398].
  • 4. Ziyaeifard M, Azarfarin R, Massoumi G. A comparison of intraocular pressure and hemodynamic responses to insertion of laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube using anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in cataract surgery. J Res Med Sci. 2012;17(6):503-7. [PubMed: 23626623]. [PubMed Central: PMC3634284].
  • 5. Peirovifar A, Eydi M, Mirinejhad MM, Mahmoodpoor A, Mohammadi A, Golzari SE. Comparison of postoperative complication between laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube during low-flow anesthesia with controlled ventilation. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(2):601-5. [PubMed: 24353586]. [PubMed Central: PMC3809272].
  • 6. Mahmoodpoor A, Golzari SE, Hamidi M, Hamidi M, Parish M, Soleimanpour H, et al. Comparison of three methods for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults: Standard, lateral and rotational. J Clin Anal Med. 2015;6(1). doi: 10.4328/jcam.1752.
  • 7. Golzari SE, Mahmoodpoor A. Laryngeal Mask Airway in Medical Emergencies. New Engl J Med. 2014;370(9):882-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1315505.
  • 8. Akhondzade R, Pipelzade MR, Gousheh MR, Sarrafan N, Mahmoodi K. Comparison of the analgesic effect of intra-articular and extra-articular injection of morphine and ketamine compound in arthrotomy lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(5):942-5. doi: 10.12669/pjms.305.4775. [PubMed: 25225503]. [PubMed Central: PMC4163208].
  • 9. Das B, Mitra S, Jamil SN, Varshney RK. Comparison of three supraglottic devices in anesthetised paralyzed children undergoing elective surgery. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012;6(3):224-8. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.101212. [PubMed: 23162394]. [PubMed Central: PMC3498659].
  • 10. Shin WJ, Cheong YS, Yang HS, Nishiyama T. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27(7):598-601. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283340a81. [PubMed: 19915475].
  • 11. Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S, Subramanyam R, Wong DT, Chung F. Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events: A prospective, randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(3):652-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cf4346. [PubMed: 20179502].
  • 12. Kahl M, Eberhart LH, Behnke H, Sanger S, Schwarz U, Vogt S, et al. Stress response to tracheal intubation in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery: Direct laryngoscopy versus an intubating laryngeal mask airway. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(3):275-80. [PubMed: 15232805].
  • 13. Watcha MF, White PF, Tychsen L, Stevens JL. Comparative effects of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube insertion on intraocular pressure in children. Anesth Analg. 1992;75(3):355-60. [PubMed: 1510256].
  • 14. Helmy AM, Atef HM, El-Taher EM, Henidak AM. Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients. Saudi J Anaesth. 2010;4(3):131-6. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.71250. [PubMed: 21189847]. [PubMed Central: PMC2980656].
  • 15. Ayedi M, Zouche I, Smaoui L, Zouari J, Abidi S, Kolsi K. Comparison of two supraglottic airway devices: I-gel and LMA-classic in pediatric anesthesi. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28:233. doi: 10.1097/00003643-201106001-00754.
  • 16. Oczenski W, Fitzgerald RD. Hemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to insertion of the Combitube®, laryngeal mask airway or tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2000;90(1):232. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200001000-00059.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments